Hi, The Council has barely discussed the RAA
amendments proposed by Staff and the Registrars, yet we are asked to
essentially approve them wholesale? Why are we asked to do that, and why
would we do that? In that scenario, one constituency gets everything it
wants done with the RAA, and nobody else has a say. Might it be a better approach to form a
group to determine which of the RAA amendments have full consensus as written,
which could have full consensus if reworded, and which should be abandoned for
now? The group could then suggest rewording of some amendments, and also
lay out a plan for sequenced requests for Issues Reports from Staff, and/or
Working Groups, to address any and all identified open issues. Meanwhile
the Board would understand which of the amendments have full consensus and
could approve those, and the other Constituencies will have greater comfort
that their issues with the RAA will be addressed. Thanks, Mike From:
owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster Yes, weighted voting
would apply. Thanks, Liz From:
owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Hi,
During
our wrap-up session in Many
thanks. K |