RE: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would suggest what I
hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 January 2009 to
29 January 2009. That would give Staff until 15 January to provide the
clarification that my motion seeks.
I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded and
passes.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on
> Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It was mentioned that in keeping with our current practice
> of being explicit with timings as much as possible, we
> should be more specific about when we will take the required
> PDP votes after receiving an Issues report. This motion is
> intended to fill that gap.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
> ----
>
> Moved by: Avri Doria
> Seconded:
>
> Whereas:
>
> An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has
> been produced and introduced to the GNSO Council.
>
> Resolve:
>
> The GNSO Council members will consult with their
> constituencies in preparation for a vote on a PDP and other
> possible motions at the Council meeting on 8 January 2009.
>