RE: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"

To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:56:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <8BD4A279E8F2487CB605E9C54D8924D9@PSEVO>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <8BD4A279E8F2487CB605E9C54D8924D9@PSEVO>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclZirX8SxVrfeaaRbGrpTFk/mTHdAAARjXQABoqKSAABpXAUAA1UhjAAACZY+AAAGxnAA==
Thread-topic: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"

Title: Whois studies: IPC comment on RyC "working model"

Thanks Philip and all BC members.

Chuck

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:46 AM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"

Please find attached BC comments on the proposed grouping of WHOIS studies.

We hope what can become essentially a friendly amendment.

Philip

References:
- [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
  - From: Philip Sheppard

Prev by Date: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
Next by Date: [council] FW: Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
Previous by thread: [council] Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
Next by thread: [council] FW: Whois studies: BC comment on RyC "working model"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread