Resp.: [council] Draft compilation of questions and comments from New gTLD sessions
Hi Olof:
Thanks for the hard work to compile all that and sorry for insisting
in the morality and public order issue. In any case, is it possible to
change the wording of the comment "What happened with blasphemy and
the others of the original seven?" for something like "The other
grounds for objection previously mentioned (such as obscenity and
sedition) have been discarded?"
I am suggesting that not only because I am not sure that there was
exactly "original seven" grounds for objection, but also because the
current wording can lead to the impression that my comment during the
weekend session almost regrets that the others were not mentioned. And
certainly that is not the case.
Best,
Carlos
2008/11/6, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Robin and all,
> Oh well, checking the doc I realize that not only did I slot your comments
> re legal rights under MOPO, I also had slotted your MOPO comments under
> Community. Must have been late when I sorted them in that way -apologies. I
> have rearranged in the attached (and changed D to G...).
> Best regards
> Olof
>
> From: Olof Nordling
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:25 PM
> To: 'Robin Gross'
> Cc: Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] Draft compilation of questions and comments from New
> gTLD sessions
>
> Hi Robin,
> Thanks - and I obviously need a hearing aid... Would appreciate your
> corrections, indeed!
> Best
> Olof
>
> From: Robin Gross [mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:54 PM
> To: Olof Nordling
> Cc: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Draft compilation of questions and comments from New
> gTLD sessions
>
> Hi Olof,
>
> Thanks for pulling it together.
>
> But it characterizes some of my comments incorrectly.
>
> The points that I made under the heading of "legal rights of others" are
> incorrectly labeled in this document as "morality and public order"
> objections.
>
> And several of my comments on the morality and public order implementation
> guidelines are not listed here at all.
>
> Also, it was Principle G I referred to on the applicants freedom of
> expression rights, not Principle D as this document states.
>
> Shall I send you my specific comments in written form to be added into this
> report so it accurately reflects the concerns I stated?
>
> Thank you,
> Robin
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 4:01 AM, Olof Nordling wrote:
>
> Dear Councilors,
> As stated earlier today, I've consolidated questions and comments raised
> during the Saturday/Sunday New gTLD sessions in a draft, attached. I have
> rearranged them in line with the Draft Applicant Guidebook modules (although
> some comments relate to more than one module). I hope this can be useful for
> Council's further work in preparing joint or individual input to the comment
> areas for the respective modules.
> Very best regards
> Olof
> <gnso council comments.doc>
>
>
>
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e:
> robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>