|
Dear all, Following the public comments regarding the new proposed
texts for transfer denial reasons #8 and #9 and the subsequent discussion on
this list, Chuck asked me to draft a motion for an amendment on this, for
consideration on the call 16 October. Please find the draft motion below – it is also on the
wiki. Very best regards Olof ---------------------- Motion on Amendment to Council Resolution on the
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Denial Definitions Policy Development
Process (PDP) Moved: Chuck Gomes Seconded: Whereas: ·
On 4 September 2008, the GNSO Council adopted a
Recommendation concluding a Policy Development Process (PDP) to clarify four of
the nine transfer denial reasons enumerated in the Inter-Registrar Transfer
Policy; ·
The ensuing public comment period rendered a
comment identifying a possibility to misinterpret a part of the proposed text
for Denial Reason #9, notably the words "or transfer to the Registrar of
Record"; ·
The GNSO Council, in consultation with members
of the drafting group for this PDP, has found it appropriate to delete these
words from the proposed text for Denial Reason #9; Resolved: 1. That Denial reason #9 in which the current text reads: A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be
determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the
original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a
decision in the dispute resolution process so directs). Be amended to read: A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be
determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the
original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a
decision in the dispute resolution process so directs). "Transferred"
shall only mean that an inter-registrar transfer has occurred in accordance
with the procedures of this policy. |