RE: [council] Notice of Motion
Hello All,
Just a redminder that in the Council meeting in Montreal on 24 June
2003,
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030624.GNSOmontreal-minutes.html
the Council accepted the following report on new gtlds:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030612.gTLDs-committee-conclusions-v7.h
tml
The council decided that:
1. Expansion of the gTLD namespace should be a bottom-up approach with
names proposed by the interested parties to ICANN. Expansion should be
demand-driven. There is no support for a pre-determined list of new
names that putative registries would bid for.
2. In line with ideas set-out in the Lynn paper March 1003[1] the
committee endorsed the concept of a set of objective criteria that
should be met in any future expansion. The development of this set of
objective criteria should be the subject of a new Policy Development
Process (PDP). Possible criteria for this PDP are listed below together
with some strategies which point to practical, non-burdensome ways in
which they can be met.
I believe that Milton's motion below is consistent with the decision
above.
Regards,
Bruce
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 October 2003 12:57 AM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: NCUC-DISCUSS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Notice of Motion
>
>
>
> This motion is intended to be considered at the Carthage
> Meeting:
>
> "In order to facilitate compliance with Section II.C.8 of the
> Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. Department of
> Commerce and ICANN, the GNSO Council requests that the Staff
> Manager produce an Issues Report on the creation and implementation
> of a regularly scheduled procedure and objective selection
> criteria for
> new TLD registries."
>
>
>
>