Aditya K Sood wrote: > Hi all > > This is the reverse Engineering layout of Scvhost Internals. > > |Category : Reverse Engineering Analysis. > > The paper solely relates to the core internals that build up the > Windows XP Svchost. The Svchost internals have not been disseminated > into informative elements yet. I have found only one or two analysis > but that wont satisfy my views regarding XP Svchost. The anatomy of > Svchost has got complexity in its own term. This pushes me to write > a specific analysis over it. The analysis provide a structural design > with concept wise dissection. The point is to understand the hidden > artifacts and how it affects the working aspect of prime service host > controller.Every process is disseminated into primary process and > secondary process. In terms related to operating system there is a parent > process and its child. If one look at the implementation scenario then > child processes are undertaken as thread internally. The kernel level > implementation is subjugated like this. The XP Svchost runs as threads > under services process.| > > http://mlabs.secniche.org/winxp_svchost.html > http://mlabs.secniche.org/papers/Win_Xp_Svc_Int.pdf > > Regards > Aks aka 0kn0ck > http://mlabs.secniche.org | http://www.secniche.org I'd like to know which of the genius moderators let this guy's information get through. He's nothing more than a plagiarist passing bad information to the community. Its shameful what Bugtraq has become. Has anyone from there taken a look at the information this clown is posting or someone asleep at the wheel. -- ==================================================== J. Oquendo "Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta" http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E sil . infiltrated @ net http://www.infiltrated.net
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature