<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability

To: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
From: evilrabbi@xxxxxxxxx
Date: 22 Nov 2006 20:55:26 -0000
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

that vuln is about as useless as the dhcpd vuln I found. I guess it's good for 
practice, but why would you brag about finding that....

Follow-Ups:
- Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
  - From: Bob Beck

Prev by Date: Lack of environment sanitization in the FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD dynamic loaders.
Next by Date: Lack of environment sanitization in the FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD dynamic loaders.
Previous by thread: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
Next by thread: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread