Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)

To: Gadi Evron <ge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
From: Brett Glass <brett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:52:16 -0700
In-reply-to: <43BDD2F4.4060903@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <43BDD2F4.4060903@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Question: Is Ilfak's patch still needed for Windows 95, 98, SE and ME
systems, for which Microsoft is refusing to provide a patch? To what
extent are these systems vulnerable if not patched?

--Brett Glass

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
  - From: Joe Polk

References:
- Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
  - From: Gadi Evron

Prev by Date: [SECURITY] [DSA 932-1] New kpdf packages fix arbitrary code execution
Next by Date: MDKSA-2006:008 - Updated koffice packages fix several vulnerabilities
Previous by thread: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
Next by thread: Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread