From the random (4) manpage: OPERATIONThe random device implements the Yarrow pseudo random number generator algorithm and maintains its entropy pool. Addditional entropy is fed to the generator regularly by the SecurityServer daemon from random jitter measurements of the kernel. SecurityServer is also responsible for peri- odically saving some entropy to disk and reloading it during startup to
provide entropy in early system operation.You may feed additional entropy to the generator by writing it to the random device, though this is not required in a normal operating environ-
ment.Now this raises some interesting issues - such as where is the entropy written to, and how much does this pool of entropy set the state of the RNG after bootup - ie, if an attacker had control of this file, could they influence the RNG in a deterministic fashion after forcing a reboot?
Kai Howells On 06/07/2005, at 3:48 PM, Thomas wrote:
Linux cited using keyboard interrupts. How many of those happen ona web server in a rack, in an air conditioned computer room somewhere ?How many happen when you open up your web browser and select your internet banking web site from your bookmarks?To complete the list, Linux uses: - block-device access - interrupt occurence - keyboard - mouse - freedback from pool extraction - pool extraction timing (doesn't matter) Even w/o devices such as keyboard and mouse Linux starts producing "a bit" entropy on an old notebook w/ just one hdd after about 2200 events (the end-phase of a booting SuSE Linux 9.0 system) Fortunately the pool is initialized in two stages... not perfect but sufficient for most systems.Twisting and stirring the bits should scatter entropy evenly in the pool.Afterwards hashing the pool contents, feeding back the hash value, and "folding" the hash value should be enough to stop every useful attack.Nevertheless I think it's time to retire for Linux' /dev/random implementationand use new approaches like Ferguson's Fortuna.What the original article was getting at is that perhaps not all of the information you think of as random information going into your PRNG is actually random. If that happens then even though the output of the PRNG "looks random", it may be predictable.Unfortunately yes. At least for Linux I am not sure how accurate the entropy estimation really is. At least during boot it is much too optimistic.DarrenThomas Biege -- Tom <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> fingerprint = F055 43E5 1F3C 4F4F 9182 CD59 DBC6 111A 8516 8DBF
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature