Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:03:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, I have no particular problem with offering SHA1 as an alternative
> hash method for those who find MD5 too weak ... but I still question the
> value of putting any random salt in the table. AFAICS you would have to
> send that salt as part of the initial password challenge, which means
> any potential attacker could find it out even before trying to
> compromise pg_shadow; so Stephen's argument that there is a useful
> improvement in protection against precomputation of password hashes
> still falls down.
>
> BTW, one could also ask exactly what threat model Stephen is concerned
> about. ISTM anyone who can obtain the contents of pg_shadow has
> *already* broken your database security.
FWIW, I do think there's some benefit to not being able to pre-compute
an entire hash table for accounts such as 'postgres' and 'www'. But I
agree it would be useful to know the actual threat model.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
- References:
- Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Prev by Date:
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Next by Date:
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Previous by thread:
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Next by thread:
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
- Index(es):