RE: libgd integer overflow

To: bugtraq <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: libgd integer overflow
From: infamous41md@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:32:55 -0400
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

libgd is NOT used by ImageMagick.  My apologies for any confusion: 
5am + multiple_advisories == bad_idea.  Thanks Rich for pointing that out.

--
-sean

Prev by Date: Re: libgd integer overflow
Next by Date: Re: Update: Web browsers - a mini-farce (MSIE gives in)
Previous by thread: Re: libgd integer overflow
Next by thread: inetutils tftp client, DNS resolving bofs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread