Paul wrote:
No need to defend Mozilla. I'm sure there has been plenty of bugs and vulnerabilities in Mozilla, it happens to all software, no way around it. The issue at with Internet Explorer and Microsoft products in general is that they don't patch the issues fast enough, and they don't take a proactive attitude. Thus, they end up with a peice of software that kills any computer it touches. The people at Mozilla, on the other hand, patch these things in a timely manner, and because of their proactive outlook on security they already have prevention steps in place to minimize the effects of a vulnerability.ok so mozilla can execute existing files on the user's system. so what? how many times has this happened to internet explorer? this is an insignificant vulnerability compared to everything in ie. internet explorer has been vulnerable to the codebase vulnerability for several years. also, you can't even specify command line parameters. and besides, this isnt even a real problem with mozilla. it is a problem with microsoft explorer. mozilla didnt make the shell: protocol; microsoft did. so in reality, this could be considered a vulnerability in microsoft software triggered in non-microsoft software. thanks a lot, microsoft...
So, don't defend Mozilla, it happens to everyone. Rather inform people what it really happening. Mozilla has the same problems as IE, but the people patch it quicker and minimize the effects of vulnerabilities. The last thing we want is a browser war in which the masses are ill-informed.
~Bill