On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:12:26PM -0000, Adam Zabrocki wrote: > > Hello > > In OLD procesors (i mean like x286 and some version x386) when the > sizeof (unsigned long) == sizeof (unsgined int) there is bug becouse it's > 2 bytes and... 2*16=32 Eh? Yes, you are talking about 16-bit processors, where the word size was 16 bits (two bytes), and sizeof(int) == 2. However, I can't remember any C compilers for Intel x86 processors where sizeof(long) != 4. Yes, 'int' was a 16-bit type, but IIRC, 'long' has always been a 32-bit type (a so-called DWORD back then) - just as the C standard requires, as others mentioned. > but i don't have in this time box with that > procesors for research this situactions and this is only theory that bug > becouse i don't know whether apache we can run on this OLD procesors. It's not just a matter of processors. You have to have OS support for sockets and stuff. Yes, this can be done under Windows in 16-bit mode or MS-DOS with the appropriate socket library, like WATTCP - http://google.com/search?q=Apache+WATTCP Still, see above for the reasons this will NOT be a problem even then. sizeof(long) >= 4, and that's that. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@xxxxxxxxxxx roam@xxxxxxxx roam@xxxxxxxxxxx PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 Thit sentence is not self-referential because "thit" is not a word.
Attachment:
pgpDHtIiuSwwr.pgp
Description: PGP signature