RE: cdp buffer overflow vulnerability

To: "Shaun Colley" <shaunige@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: cdp buffer overflow vulnerability
From: "Dave Paris" <dparis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:40:57 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20040331161611.75451.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

I would respectfully recommend submitting a more descriptive subject line
next time.  I saw "cdp" and the first thing that came to mind was "Cisco
Discovery Protocol".

Kind Regards,
-dsp

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shaun Colley [mailto:shaunige@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:16 AM
> To: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: cdp buffer overflow vulnerability
>
>
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
> Product:      cdp - console cd player
[...]

References:
- cdp buffer overflow vulnerability
  - From: Shaun Colley

Prev by Date: Google using Expired Cert and SSLv2
Next by Date: Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)
Previous by thread: cdp buffer overflow vulnerability
Next by thread: Re: cdp buffer overflow vulnerability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread