Re: Unhackable network really unhackable?
* bugjules@xxxxxxxxxxx (Julian Wynne) [Thu 27 Nov 2003, 19:14 CET]:
[..]
> Furthermore we would like to point out that InvisiLAN technology has no
> relation whatsoever with DHCP, for example InvisiLAN changes randomly
> not just the IP address but also the MAC address and the port numbers.
That rules out long-living TCP sessions. Kind of defeats the purpose of
having a machine connected, doesn't it?
-- Niels.
--
[Please reply to niels=bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxx instead. I'm sick and tired
of all the morons who misconfigure their mailers and send autoreplies
back after anybody contributes something to a mailing list.]