RE: [alac] Revised statement on registry services
Agree very strongly with Roberto. Time to have and manage expected processes
that involve the ALSs in every thing, and perhaps even think about the eventual
establishment of a RALO and its representation on the ALAC board.
ken
Kenneth Hamma
Asst. Director, Getty Museum
Sr. Advisor for Information Policy, Getty Trust
1200 Getty Center Drive, 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90049-1687
v +1 310 440 7186
e khamma@xxxxxxxxx
f +1 310 440 7752
http://www.getty.edu
http://getty.art.museum
>>> "Roberto Gaetano" <alac_liaison@xxxxxxxxxxx> 01/15/04 12:37AM >>>
Yes, it does.
Due to time constraints, I am only quickly going through these documents, as
I am currently focusing more on the accreditation and mainly on the outreach
of potential ALS.
Specifically, I believe that it is very important to distribute this
material to accreditated ALS, and solicit their feedback.
Regards,
Roberto GAETANO
ALAC
ICANN BoD Liaison
>From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [alac] Revised statement on registry services
>Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:24:05 +0100
>
>I'm attaching a slightly revised version of the proposed registry
>services statement that attempts to take into account the feed-back
>I had so far. I'd propose that this document (minus change
>tracking, of course) is put out for public comment, and is sent to
>accredited at-large structures for their feed-back. At the same
>time, I'd also like to forward this to the council as a preliminary
>statement, with the caveat that we are soliciting comments and may
>be following up with a summary of the additional input we are
>receiving.
>
>Does this work for you guys?
>
>Regards,
>--
>Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
><< alac-on-regsvcs.pdf >>
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail