<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [alac] Revised statement on registry services



Yes, it does.
Due to time constraints, I am only quickly going through these documents, as I am currently focusing more on the accreditation and mainly on the outreach of potential ALS. Specifically, I believe that it is very important to distribute this material to accreditated ALS, and solicit their feedback.
Regards,
Roberto GAETANO
ALAC
ICANN BoD Liaison





From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [alac] Revised statement on registry services
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:24:05 +0100

I'm attaching a slightly revised version of the proposed registry
services statement that attempts to take into account the feed-back
I had so far.  I'd propose that this document (minus change
tracking, of course) is put out for public comment, and is sent to
accredited at-large structures for their feed-back.  At the same
time, I'd also like to forward this to the council as a preliminary
statement, with the caveat that we are soliciting comments and may
be following up with a summary of the additional input we are
receiving.

Does this work for you guys?

Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
<< alac-on-regsvcs.pdf >>

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail