[alac] (fwd) RE: ALAC Bylaws interpretation issue
We now have an official interpretation for our Bylaws requirement for At
Large Structure accreditation. We are required to get 10 favourable votes in
any case - so it is necessary that all ALAC members participate to votes.
>To: "'Vittorio Bertola'" <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: ALAC Bylaws interpretation issueR
>From: "John Jeffrey" <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 06:40:17 -0800
>Cc: "'Denise Michel'" <denisemichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "'Roberto Getano'" <alac_liaison@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Vittorio,
>
>Pursuant to XI, Section 2 (4)(i), the answer is 2/3 of all committee
>members. If there are 15 total committee members, then it will require 10.
>Abstention, failure to vote or other issues have no impact on the number
>required.
>
>If you have any additional questions regarding this or any other matter,
>please let me know.
>
>Best,
>John
--
vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Vecchio sito, nuovo toblòg...