I agree to send the document as is.Personally, I would have preferred a shorter text, with some key issues, like the preference to remove the limitation to sTLDs, and moreover the limitation to the 2000 candidatures. However, I applaude the initiative, and don't think that we need now to trim details.
At our next teleconference, I plan to report about the discussions on the BoD mailing list. Since we have now a liaison, we might use it for a short message summarizing the key points of our position. Up to now, I have expressed only my personal position, that is for no further delay in the introduction of new TLDs, and for enhancing diversity. I feel this to be the majority position of ALAC, but since we did not have a formal decision, I kept in at the personal level.
Roberto GAETANO ALAC ICANN BoD Liaison
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Interim ALAC <alac@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [alac] Suggested response to sTLD RFP Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:44:27 +0200 On 2003-08-26 11:27:17 +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote: > As we've already past the deadline, I propose to send this > immediately. Agreed. -- Thomas Roessler <roessler (at) does-not-exist.org>
_________________________________________________________________Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail