[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ga] Companion Dispute Proposal to WLS Service

To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Subject: Re: [ga] Companion Dispute Proposal to WLS Service
From: Marc Schneiders <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 00:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: John Berryhill <john@johnberryhill.com>, <ga@dnso.org>
Delivered-To: roessler@yoda.does-not-exist.org
Delivered-To: tlrpop@mediacompany.com
Delivered-To: roessler@mediacompany.com
In-Reply-To: <020701c20d76$6f002e20$01000001@RRADER2K>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, at 12:23 [=GMT-0400], Ross Wm. Rader wrote:

> > Maybe we can remedy the grave injustice done to trademark owners a bit by
> > a WLS sunrise? I think VeriSign could easily demand $500 per domain for
> > sunrise WLSes.
>
> Some sort of a vetting process would be desirable. Sunrise violates FCFS, so
> why not make it a truly even-handed and allow for a filing/objection process
> that would allow TM owners to actually sort out the details beforehand.

A lottery for which VeriSign sells tickets seems the solution.

> Not sure how this would work but, I'm not a TM lawyer either ;)

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] Companion Dispute Proposal to WLS Service
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>

References:
- Re: [ga] Companion Dispute Proposal to WLS Service
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ga] [fwd] Nominating Committee & at-large (from: roessler@does-not-exist.org)
Next by Date: Re: [ga] Companion Dispute Proposal to WLS Service
Prev by thread: Re: [ga] Companion Dispute Proposal to WLS Service
Next by thread: Re: [ga] Companion Dispute Proposal to WLS Service
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread