[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Re: Redelegation issues
Eric, now which ccTLD you said you represnt or in charge of?
John, if we go by your treasury argument, then at least the leading 25 .com
registrars are already in violation of the law by selling thousands of names to
citizens of Iraq & Libya. Do a whois query and you will find out for yourself.
Jeff, can you please be more specific to the laws that ICANN staff broke as you
do mention in your email!
In my personal opinion, the role and interaction of ICANN is no different than
that of communications companies providing long distance services to the
countries you mention here, isn't it?
Regards,
Asaad Alnajjar
CEO Millennium Inc ( Los Angeles, CA, USA )
AINC Executive Director
----- Original Message -----
From: <eric@hi-tek.com>
To: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: "John Berryhill" <john@johnberryhill.com>; "Elisabeth Porteneuve"
<Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>; <DannyYounger@cs.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Redelegation issues
> Let me make sure that my take is very clear on the issue of ccTLDs.
>
> ICANN keep you infested hands off and let the sovereigns run their own show.
>
> You have no business interfering with sovereigns and need to stay the hell
out.
>
> Sell a connectivity service and shut up.
>
> Is that clear enough?
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > John and all assembly members,
> >
> > John Berryhill wrote:
> >
> > > > stability of the Internet, responsibility and service to the
> > > > Internet users.
> > >
> > > >From the viewpoint of a U.S. corporation, i.e. ICANN, an over-riding
> > > consideration is obedience to the law. We have, for example, an economic
> > > embargo of Libya (.ly)in effect in the United States. We also have
embargoes
> > > against Myanmar (.mm), Iran (.ir), North Korea (.kp not delegated), and
Cuba
> > > (.cu), among others.
> > >
> > > Quite frankly, if ICANN staff are negotiating ccTLD contracts with these
> > > countries, then they had better get a license from the U.S. Treasury, or
> > > they should be arrested and imprisoned.
> >
> > I agree with you here John. The problem is that presently the ICANN
> > staff has already broke several other laws as you well know. As such,
> > they seem to be in the mode or of the opinion as to be above US
> > law. Hence I doubt that the ICANN staff is at all concerned if they
> > are negotiating with any of the above listed ccTLD managers...
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html