Re: [At-Large] Rules of procedure, draft 2
Hi Siavash
I agree with the distinction between adhoc task forces etc and liaisons to
the Board, GNSO, etc. But GNSO for example, Bret wasn't ALAC, but did a
great job. So the "normally" would work for me. I'd want to include that
they need to be very familiar with ALAC and ICANN processes.
I'm good with 9 as the absolute number. Either proposal that takes us to
that number is fine.
Jacqueline
-----Original Message-----
From: Siavash Shahshahani [mailto:shahshah@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:52 PM
To: Vittorio Bertola
Cc: Interim ALAC
Subject: Re: [At-Large] Rules of procedure, draft 2
> I am now asking for opinions on the two remaining open parts, so that
> hopefully we can reach consensus
>
> Here they are:
>
>
> ==> 1.g (new section) on criteria for officers - this is what I came up
> with as a first draft:
>
> -----
>
> Suggestions welcome.
--------------------------------------
I suggest a revision to reflect the following:
There should be a distinction between liaisons and those selected for
specific task forces. Liaisons should be more familiar with the current
atmosphere of ALAC and RALOs because they should be prepared to reflect
ALAC thinking on any problem that arises, while Task Forces are more
narrowly focused and presumably the person chosen by ICANN is qualified
for the particular task. So I suggest that the wording for liaisons be
such that 'normally' an ALAC member or recent member be expected to be
appointed, while no such preference be stated for task forces.
----------------------------------------------------
>
> ==> 6.d and 11.b, majorities necessary to recall officers and amend the
> rules - as agreed, here is a recap of different proposals:
>
--------------------------------------------------------
I thought that the absolute number 9 answered all concerns in the
telephone conference. If everybody votes, then 9 is one more than simple
majority, in fact it is half+one rounded up; if the minimum quorum of 10
vote, then 9 is large enough not to make such a vote easy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with Adam that we should formalize our selection for NomComm;
here's an area where we could ask the public and specially the ALSs for
nominations.
Best,
Siavash
> Ciao,
> --
> vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <--------
> --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> www.alac.icann.org
> www.icannalac.org
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org
www.icannalac.org
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/762 - Release Date: 4/15/2007
4:22 PM
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/762 - Release Date: 4/15/2007
4:22 PM
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org
www.icannalac.org