Re: [At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Termsof Reference forIndependent Review of the At-Large AdvisoryCmt. (and At-Large structures)
I think ALAC (ALS and RALOs) should see the
review as a great opportunity to show what that
can do. That the Nominating Committee's being
reviewed at the same time might be seen as an
opportunity: what can the RALOs and ALS
contribute to the NomCom, could the play a
greater role in making selections? (NomCom's
missed named: it's a selection committee.)
NomCom (I'm the associate chair, but speaking for
myself not the committee) held a workshop in
Lisbon. Not very well attended, but Vint Cerf's
comments are worth noting
<http://www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/transcript-nomcom-28mar07.htm>
>>VINT CERF: It occurs to me -- I can't predict
>>this, of course, but it occurs to me that if we
>>are successful with the rapidly forming RALO
>>structure that some day we might imagine that
>>board members might be appointed by those RALOs.
We're not there yet. But is it possible that we
can now go to the formed RALOs and say, in
emulation of what might ultimately occur, can you
supply recommendations for people to serve on the
ALAC. (end quote)
Not the first time I've heard Vint mention this possibility.
ALAC proving that it really does enable
"individual Internet users' informed
participation in ICANN" would be a good challenge
for the review. It's not clear to me how how
that really happens.
Adam
At 2:39 PM +0000 4/6/07, carlos aguirre wrote:
>Mi Querida Jacqueline:
>
>obviously my intention wasn't to be negative,
>only to express my opinion about that, in my
>short experience on that.
>
>I'm sure that every work is positive in all
>sense or could result positive, I hope that this
>intent to be one of them.
>
>but also is evident the asincronismo of this
>procedure, and I have some doubts if the results
>will be efficient in some topics for the reasons
>that I gave in my first mail.
>
>It's only a comment. I'm thinking in a high voice.
>
>Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
>
>
>From: "Jacqueline A. Morris" <jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: "carlos aguirre"
><carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jacqueline
>Morris" <jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>ajp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>CC: "ALAC main list" <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public
>Comments on Proposed Termsof Reference
>forIndependent Review of the At-Large
>AdvisoryCmt. (and At-Large structures)
>Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:08:22 +0000 GMT
>>Hola Carlos
>>Actually, the RALO structure for AtLarge was
>>supposed to start ages ago. They have only just
>>got going after a little more than 3 years. And
>>the review was supposed to be after 3 years, I
>>think. So the timing is a little off, but we
>>should be positive, and hope that the review
>>takes the newness of the RALOs into
>>consideration. Actually, we have to push and
>>start doing work as well. At least, that's what
>>I think, for what it's worth :)
>>Jacqueline
>>Sent via BlackBerry service from bmobile
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: "carlos aguirre" <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:39:02
>>To:jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ajp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Cc:alac@xxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public
>>Comments on Proposed Termsof Reference for
>> Independent Review of the At-Large AdvisoryCmt. (and At-Large structures)
>>
>>I think, particularly, the revision arrives
>>behind schedule or very early, but certainly
>>out of time . ALAC has got another structure
>>now, with the inclusion of RALOs, and in fact
>>those RALOs haven't started to work yet.
>>
>>
>>Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
>>
>>----------------
>> From: jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: Adam Peake <ajp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>CC: alac@xxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public
>>Comments on Proposed Termsof Reference for
>>Independent Review of the At-Large AdvisoryCmt.
>>(and At-Large structures)
>>Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:17:20 -0400
>>
>>
>>I totally agree with you Adam - that's what I'd
>>love to come out of the review.
> >
>>Franck, the RALO structure for ALAC was set up
>>a while ago. We just got the RALOs going after
>>3 years, but the review is overdue (per Adam's
>>response), so it seems weird, but it's just the
>>timing.
>>
>>Jacqueline
>>
>>Quoting Adam Peake <ajp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> > because ICANN's bylaws require all supporting
>> > organizations, councils etc to be reviewed on a
>> > regular basis, and the ALAC structures haven't
>> > yet been reviewed, and are behind schedule for
>> > review
>> >
>><http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#IV-4:
>><http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#IV-4> >.
>> >
>> > This might be a positive step. With RALOs in
>> > place, an outcome might be to allow for more
>> > direct representation rather than the current
>> > rather weak and indirect liaison structure.
>> > Perhaps...
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Adam
>> >
>> >
>> > At 9:28 PM +1200 4/5/07, Franck Martin wrote:
>> >> Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs
>> >> and then decide to review it, before they even
>> >> did any work?
>> >>
>> >> I'm certainly confused here.
>> >>
>> >> On 4/5/07, Denise Michel
>> >> <<mailto:denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dear members of the At-Large community:
>> >>
>> >> Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public
>> >> comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would
>> >> guide the independent review of ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee and
>> >> global At-Large structures and processes
>> >>
>><<http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm";>http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>.
>> >> The public
>> >> comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007. Please send comments to:
>> >> <<mailto:alac-review-tor@xxxxxxxxx>alac-review-tor@xxxxxxxxx>.
>> >> View comments at:
>> >>
>><<http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> >> Franck Martin
>> >> <mailto:franck.martin@xxxxxxxxx>franck.martin@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question"
>> >> G. Bachelard
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> ALAC mailing list
>> >> ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>
>>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org:
>><http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> >>
>> >> www.alac.icann.org
>> >> www.icannalac.org
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ALAC mailing list
>> > ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org:
>><http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> >
>> > www.alac.icann.org
>> > www.icannalac.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>--
>>Jacqueline A. Morris
>>www.jacquelinemorris.com
>>
>>
>>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >ALAC mailing list
>> >ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> >
>> >www.alac.icann.org
>> >www.icannalac.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----------------
>>Sé uno de los primeros a testar el Windows Live
>>Messenger beta. ¡Haz click aquí! :
>><http://g.msn.com/8HMAESAR/2731??PS=47575>
>
>
>
>Sabe más sobre la próxima generación del MSN
>Messenger.
><http://g.msn.com/8HMBESAR/2746??PS=47575>¡Haz
>click aquí!
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
www.alac.icann.org
www.icannalac.org