<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Terms of Reference for Independent Review of the At-Large Advisory Cmt. (and At-Large structures)



Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs and then decide to review it, before they even did any work?

I'm certainly confused here.

On 4/5/07, Denise Michel <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear members of the At-Large community:

Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public
comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would
guide the independent review of ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee and
global At-Large structures and processes
<http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>. The public
comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007.  Please send comments to:
<alac-review-tor@xxxxxxxxx>. View comments at:
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>.


--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Franck Martin
franck.martin@xxxxxxxxx
"Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question"
G. Bachelard
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

www.alac.icann.org
www.icannalac.org