Re: [At-Large] Message from dot mobi
On 2007-03-25 19:07:28 +0100, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
> It may be useful to note that this was discussed by the ALAC at
> the time Vittorio was voted in as the Board Liaison and it was
> decided that there was no impediment to his remaining as liaison
> as a consequence of not being a member of the ALAC, provided that
> the funding existed to allow him to travel to F2F board meetings
> which would otherwise be funded to a member of ALAC.
So?
My point is that, on the .mobi policy board, we're now approaching a
situation in which *both* ALAC representatives are former members of
the committee. The community might find that fine or not; I'm
suggesting that it might be good style to have one former committee
member there (for experience) and either a new committee member or
somebody else from the community to complement that person.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>