Re: [At-Large] Message from dot mobi
I think this would be a good point of time to consider whether that
representative needs to be an ALAC member at all. Seeing the
traffic around forming a EURALO, you won't be on the committee any
more soon, so my sense would be that it might be good to keep John L
there, but that you should withdraw from your position, and be
replaced by somebody else.
Cheers,
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 2007-03-25 16:09:04 +0100, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> From: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Interim ALAC <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:09:04 +0100
> Subject: [At-Large] Message from dot mobi
> List-Id: At-Large Worldwide Community
> <alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org.atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
>
> All,
>
> as you know, we appoint two representatives to the dot mobi policy board -
> currently being I and John Levine. As John resigned from the ALAC, there
> was some discussion on whether the appointment needs to be revised; both
> dot mobi (upon verifying their Bylaws) and John agree that it would be
> possible and good if he continued to serve at least up to the end of his
> present term. So they asked me to transmit the attached message -
> basically, they are asking whether the ALAC has any objection to John
> continuing to serve even while not being an ALAC member any more. Does
> anyone have any objection?
>
> Ciao,
> --
> vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <--------
> --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> www.alac.icann.org
> www.icannalac.org