<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [At-Large] Message from dot mobi



I think this would be a good point of time to consider whether that
representative needs to be an ALAC member at all.  Seeing the
traffic around forming a EURALO, you won't be on the committee any
more soon, so my sense would be that it might be good to keep John L
there, but that you should withdraw from your position, and be
replaced by somebody else.

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler   <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>






On 2007-03-25 16:09:04 +0100, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> From: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Interim ALAC <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:09:04 +0100
> Subject: [At-Large] Message from dot mobi
> List-Id: At-Large Worldwide Community
>       <alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org.atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
> 
> All,
> 
> as you know, we appoint two representatives to the dot mobi policy board - 
> currently being I and John Levine. As John resigned from the ALAC, there 
> was some discussion on whether the appointment needs to be revised; both 
> dot mobi (upon verifying their Bylaws) and John agree that it would be 
> possible and good if he continued to serve at least up to the end of his 
> present term. So they asked me to transmit the attached message - 
> basically, they are asking whether the ALAC has any objection to John 
> continuing to serve even while not being an ALAC member any more. Does 
> anyone have any objection?
> 
> Ciao,
> -- 
> vb.                   Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu   <--------
> -------->  finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/  <--------
> 
> 


> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> www.alac.icann.org
> www.icannalac.org