<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: DRAFT: Statement on Registry Services.



Is there any feed-back on this document?  General constituency
statements on this are due on January 12 (that is, tomorrow), and I
don't want to exceed that deadline too much in submitting our
comments.

Of course, if there is no interest in this issue, we can also
refrain from submitting comments.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/






On 2004-01-04 12:49:24 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:49:24 +0100
> Subject: DRAFT: Statement on Registry Services.
> Mail-Followup-To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> I'm attaching a draft for what might become ALAC's statement on the
> new registry services issue.  Comments welcome!
> 
> Happy new year,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/


Attachment: alac-on-regsvcs.doc
Description: Binary data

Attachment: alac-on-regsvcs.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document