Is there any feed-back on this document? General constituency statements on this are due on January 12 (that is, tomorrow), and I don't want to exceed that deadline too much in submitting our comments. Of course, if there is no interest in this issue, we can also refrain from submitting comments. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/ On 2004-01-04 12:49:24 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: alac@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:49:24 +0100 > Subject: DRAFT: Statement on Registry Services. > Mail-Followup-To: alac@xxxxxxxxx > X-Spam-Level: > > I'm attaching a draft for what might become ALAC's statement on the > new registry services issue. Comments welcome! > > Happy new year, > -- > Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
Attachment:
alac-on-regsvcs.doc
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
alac-on-regsvcs.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document